Sunday, July 31, 2005

Revolt of the 19th Century

Edited & brought to you by ilaxi

Byline by MJ Akbar : Revolt of the 19th Century

Everything has been happening when nothing happens. Good management is not about solving problems; it is about preventing problems. And so when a part of India does not jump at us from the front pages, it is a safe guess that the chief minister has his eye on trouble spots and someone is doing something to lance the boil before the simmering and potentially septic puss erupts.

Haryana’s chief minister, Bhupinder Singh Hooda, is still an infant in office, which is when most mistakes of omission are made. He made every mistake possible in the confrontation between the workers of a Japanese multinational, Honda, and its management at Gurgaon. He ignored the slow burning anger of the workers for weeks. His first response to the crisis in which policemen were first beaten up, and then took barbaric revenge, was uncertain and irritable. When the fire, fuelled by stark television images, began to singe him and his leaders in Delhi joined the roast, he went into vocal appeasement mode and forgot the practical, as for instance the need for extra, emergency medical facilities, thereby feeding media with another day’s story. Finally, while he had to hold police officers accountable, since they were obviously and visibly guilty, he forgot to add that the workers were guilty as well, for they began the violence.

The Haryana police, which is going to be around when all the workers have gone back to work, will remember this lapse of memory. A chief minister with an indifferent police force is only a minister, not a chief.

Here is a suggestion for all executives in public life. If you want to manage the troubles of our nation, create a war room. Place a huge map on one of the walls, with lots of lights around it so that you don’t miss anything. Get the chief secretary and the police chief to flag all the places where social tension is likely, has spurted out but been controlled, or where it is growing and could go out of control. Get a status report every morning, and ensure that the officials briefing you are not telling lies, or covering their backs with evasion. Eruptions will still take place, for India is exploding with anger just below surface level. But at least chief ministers — or indeed Prime Ministers — will not be surprised when the splinters hit them in the face.

The story of the police onslaught on workers at Gurgaon, Haryana, is a little deeper than swinging lathis, however dramatic that might have been, or the failure of the Japanese management system, whose paternalism rarely has the breadth to reach industrial colonies in foreign lands.

We are in the summer of 2005. The last time Indian working class anger dominated the news was in the summer of 1974, when George Fernandes led a national railway strike and Mrs Indira Gandhi responded with harsh measures to break it. That is 31 years, or a generation-and-a-half, ago. (I am ignoring Datta Samant’s irresponsible and self-indulgent misrule of textile workers in Mumbai, because that was egotism, not trade unionism, and therefore turned sour and counterproductive. The millowners used the foolishness of Samant to close a meagre-benefit industry and became doubly rich as masters of vacant property in the heart of Mumbai.)

In a developed country three decades of peace would be good news. It is bad news in a country that lives across centuries: those below the poverty line are in the worst phase of the 19th century; the urban poor live in the early part of the 20th century; the middle class live in the middle of the 20th century; a minuscule few have entered the 21st century. There is too much anger at base volcanic level, waiting for a chance to turn into lava.

One reason is that the dialectic of India’s democratic politics shifted, in the 1980s, from economics to communalism. Then, in the 1990s, both organised labour and the middle class were pacified with sops — aspirations, consumerism and rising incomes thanks to fresh foreign capital, innovation and competition. Aspirations are a problem in an uneven economy, for while they comfort 20 per cent at the top (the creamy layer, to use a quaintly Indian economic formulation), they create great resentments in the thick slabs below. The slabs may not be even, nor the resentment uniform, but resentment exists.

Moreover, in 1975 television was not around, except as a droning black and white propaganda box that dished out half an hour of utterly boring news that viewers watched only to look at glamorous news readers. No one actually heard anything on television. Today, independent channels bring you news. But they are not half as potent as the entertainment channels that take the world of the rich and the beautiful into the homes of the impoverished and the plain. The poor now know what they are being denied. Television also promotes a greater sense of reality than cinema, which is always closer to fantasy. At one level this angst creates a market for products that promise to make young, or even old women look beautiful within 28 days. (Since in our unhappy self-image, beautiful is synonymous with fair, these globs of acid sold as cream have to make you fair as well. It would be interesting to find out how much of television ad revenue comes out of false promises.) At another level, this creates a sense of injustice that the political or the economic system has long stopped trying to assuage.

If this was all the news, it might still leave some room for comfort. The worry is, or should be, not the violence that we have seen but the violence that we could see. Those Indians left behind in the 19th century are beginning to mobilise, and Indians cocooned in the 21st century have no idea what to do about the spreading people’s armies. The plural is accurate, for there is more than one army. But they have a single motivation: to create a parallel state until they can destroy the state that has left them behind. We use a loose term for them. We call them Naxalites.

The Naxalites do not sit outside the gates of multinational factories for a month waiting to be heard. They collect taxes, they have funds, they buy sophisticated weapons, and they shoot. When the Naxalites feel threatened by the state machinery, or when they want to take revenge, they do not use the lathis that the workers at Gurgaon wielded. They plant powerful bombs in the way of a Chandrababu Naidu’s convoy in Andhra Pradesh; or they attack banks and police stations at Madhubani in Bihar. The Naxalites do not depend on Leftist Members of Parliament for publicity or a trade union movement for solidarity. They keep their wounds hidden, their secrets to themselves, and work through a network that crawls through village and jungle between Andhra Pradesh and Nepal, extending to Orissa and Bihar in the east and Maharashtra in the west. According to one report, more than 7,000 villages are already under their control, and two villages at the very least are joining this parallel state every week.

Underneath a thin sheen, we Indians remain casteist and sectarian. The two groups that have suffered the worst humiliation, through centuries, are the Dalits (formerly the Untouchables) and the tribals. The process of the politicisation of Dalits started with the venerable Dr B.R. Ambedkar and is in the aggressive hands of Ms Mayawati at the moment. They are beginning to find their niche in our democracy, even though their impoverishment has not ended.

The human and economic exploitation of tribals has been a shocking story, and one that is not told very often because the tribals do not have a voice. Their women suffer rape in silence; the men have no answer to sophisticated and crude economic exploitation. (The Church, incidentally, is one of the few groups doing exemplary work in tribal areas of Jharkhand, and is therefore targeted by the establishment.) At long last the tribals are mobilising politically and doing so under the banner of the Naxalites. Tribals are brought out by Delhi to dance at the Republic Day festival. They are now getting ready to make Delhi dance to their tune. It will be a danse macabre.

I did not use the image of a war room lightly. There is a social war going on, but since government survives behind the screen surrounding Delhi, or any capital city, it is blind to that war. Sometimes defeated candidates in a Parliamentary election return shell-shocked at the power of Naxalites; but winners of course never see anything, for they live under the illusion that their party or their charisma has got them victory.

The masses of the 19th century are at war with the elitists of the 21st in India. The latter are armed. The former are angry. Don’t take the outcome for granted.

5 comments:

Alto said...

Dear Sir,

I have a feeling that you might have erred in your recent byline about presenting Datta Samanth.

The case study of
Kamani tubes experiment of "Worker's take over of Industry": was about how an industry which was about to be declared sick and was about to be closed down was efficiently bargained by workers to transfer the management to workers and how it started performing profitably later.

Datta Samanth was inspirer behind this experiment which succeeded.

Of course there was politicisation of personality, which is normal.

When there is strong personality with an ideal, any political party will be willing to use that personality for personal growth of political party which is what might have happened in Datta Samanth's case.

The ills of textile mills though apparently look as though are caused by individual personality, in reality, the problem lies else where.
One of those major plaguing ills which is eating up India even now is to have been forced to accept it's status as signatory to GATT(1945-46) even after it became independent in 1947.

( India was tricked( like any other colonised country) to sign and join WTO in 1995 as automatic member country which was signatory of earlier 1945 GATT monstrous treaty )

In essence what it means is, before Colonial British ( Club of Rome ) gave up India for its Independence and as if it was not enough that Lady Batten was used to tear it into two pieces, British India made sure Colonial India sign GATT ( General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) a monstrous treaty in 1945 which Independent India would have never signed.

British gave up old system of exploitation only after new system of exploitation was created, ensured and was in place.

Got it?

So if you go into the history of Partition, Poverty, UN and ideals and objectives of UN organization you will be startled to know why we are running after blood sucking monsters like WTO .

To give you an example, on being asked what is ILO-International Labour Office is doing when WTO is making rules to suck the blood and sweat of poor country’s workers, one of the ILO officials sharply remarked that, ILO’s main objective/ purpose of formation under the aegis of UN was to “block the spread of industrial revolution of Western Europe to colonies”

Do you know what it means? It means ILO was created to prove manual labour though hard is less expensive and of low quality than mechanised and automated labour which even though works out cheaper and is monotonous and lacking in creativity as expensive product.

Is not that a lie to its core?

Pandit Nehru objected, but as long as he was alive, monstrous treaty was left to be dampened.

But monstrous treaty was allowed to grow its tentacles, with the help of Manmohan Singh kind of half knowedge professionals who paved basis to "reforms" ( which truly means "regression of Indian employment" and its formalisation in 1990 under the garb of economic development, but infact accepting to "devalue rupee" and voluntarily acknowledging Indians work value as lesser than his western counterpart.

Why? Why did we accept that.

We did because our politicians speak for 20% cream who want free money flows in the form of FDI and are lazy to work. While these creamylayer exploit 80% indians who toil day and night to keep this 20% happy, this 20% fools join hands with 1% crooks of rich nations to not only exploit this 80% but to sell their lives without any debate or discussion or permission.

We fell back on two decades of development (1985-2005), because our textiles have been blocked from export and our textile mills had to go sick and close.( ManMohan Singh kind of dalaals have ensured and prescribed such overkill to our poor, whom only blind fools can fondly call him as Doctor with vision)

It is not because of Datta Samanth.
It is because India was not alert to the trick to which it was manipulated. As usual our politicians trust the Western rich too much and take the veracity of any Western institution for granted and sign it.
Result our Indians pay price.
What happened to textiles is also happening now with our food production. today.
Innumerable “intellectuals” are bent upon proving a lie either due to greed or due to half knowledge and that includes our PM Manmohan Singh
PM of India says that 2005 will be 8% growth rate and under lobbying pressure he is asked to bring that percentage down to 6%
Tell me, whom are we deceiving, ourselves or our own people in India.

I agree it is impossible for a journalist/professional to know what is happening in other professions or specializations except through politicized fringe news which marks headlines.

Though I cannot claim to have all knowledge about it, I am sure if one wishes to one can ensure a system based on Justice, Participation and Trust even in Industrial production.

Key words for googling are
“Justice based Management”, “Worker’s management and ownership”
“Organized relations and equity participation by workers in management”

People who see America as white elephant and West Bengal as red elephant( Suhel Seth's article: Gurgaon going Bengal way ) should know that there are many management studies which reflect the efficiency of employee management of company, from none other than American institutes, which promptly recommend such change in management and labor relations.

Key to understand such chaotic situation is to understand tht problem lies elsewhere:

Our nation agreeing to continue unequal relations of production and management ( through GATT of 1945 which became WTO in 1995 ) after nominal Independence is THE SOURCE of the problem.

Dalaals like Manmohan Singh who ensure it are the enemies and cowards and not friends of Indian nation.

guile said...

nice, comfy place you got here :)..

Anonymous said...

The situation as you aptly described is akin to a volcano waiting to burst and the result may be as catclysmic.
Arvind Kumar, Advocate
Patna High Court

St Louis Cardinals BUFF said...

So many blogs and only 10 numbers to rate them. I'll have to give you a 9 because you have a quailty topic.

Free Access To More Information Aboutdepartment of health and human services

Praveen said...

Sir,
I feel very happy while reading ur article because only less people in India look towards the problem behind the orgin of every military outfits..no body think of the rotten social customs which are carried over through centuries...
Thanking You..
Praveen