Questions for Hafiz Saeed
MJ Akbar
03 February 2013
03 February 2013
Times of India
A question for the internationally
recognised terrorist, ideologue and mastermind of the 2008 Mumbai attack, Hafiz
Saeed, resident of Lahore, who has just offered sanctuary in Pakistan to our
superstar Shah Rukh Khan. Pakistan was carved out in 1947 to ensure security
for this subcontinent's Muslims in a separate homeland. Why, six decades later,
has Pakistan become the most insecure place for Muslims in the world? Why are
more Muslims being killed each day, on an average, in Pakistan than in the rest
of the Muslim world put together?
This continual mass murder is not being done by Hindus and
Sikhs, who were once proud residents of Punjab and Sindh but are now merely a
near-invisible trace. Some Pakistan leaders even express pride in the fact that
non-Muslims , who constituted around 20 per cent of the population in 1947,
have been reduced to less than 2 per cent. In contrast, the percentage of
Muslims in secular India has increased since independence. Hindus and Sikhs are
not killing Muslims in Pakistan; Muslims are murdering Muslims, and on a scale
unprecedented in the history of Punjab, the North West Frontier and Sindh. Why?
There have been riots in India, some of them horrendous. But
the graph is one of ebb from the peak of 1947. When a riot does occur, as in
Maharashtra recently, civil society and media stand up to demand
accountability, and the ground pressure of a secular democracy forces even
reluctant governments to cooperate in punishment of the guilty. When Shias, or
other sectarians, are mass-murdered in Pakistan on a regular basis, the killers
celebrate a "duty" well done.
History's paradox is evident: Muslims today are safer in
India than in Pakistan. The "muhajirs" who left the cities of Uttar
Pradesh and Bihar in 1947 would have been far safer in Lucknow, Patna and
dozens of cities in their original land than they are now in the tense streets
and by-lanes of Karachi.
Could Shah Rukh Khan have become an international heart
throb if his parents had joined the emigration in 1947? Since he is talented he
would have gained some recognition on the fringes of elite society, but he
could not have become a central presence of a popular culture that has seeped
and spread to every tehsil and village. Nor is Shah Rukh the only Muslim
superstar in Mumbai's film world; Salman Khan is bigger than him. Shah Rukh and
Salman and Amir Khan do not hide their identity through an alias; their birth
name is their public persona.
The television set in my office serves two main purposes: it
shows cricket and offers access to an FM radio station which plays old film
songs. A song by Muhammad Rafi was on the air while the previous paragraph was
being written: Man re tu kahe na dheer dhare. It is a beautiful classic,
written by Sahir Ludhianvi. Rafi, as his name confirms, was a Muslim. He was
born in 1924 in western Punjab and came to Mumbai as a very young man in search
of dreams. Those dreams had not come true by 1947. Rafi had the option of
returning to Lahore. He chose to remain in Mumbai, and brought his family in
what might be called the reverse direction. It was a wise choice. Mumbai made
Rafi's voice immortal. Rafi, like India, was the distillation of many
inspirations.
Hafiz Saeed and his ilk possess cramped, virulent minds
which condemn the ragas upon which our subcontinent's music, both classic and
popular, is based, as inimical. They want to destroy a shared Hindu-Muslim
cultural heritage in which Muslim maestros took classical music to splendid
heights under the patronage of padishahs, rajahs and nawabs . Instead of art,
they possess vitriol, even as the violence they spawn turns Pakistan into a
laboratory of chaos. They call themselves guardians of their nation, but they
are in fact regressive theocrats who are shredding the Pakistan that Jinnah
imagined.
There is an answer to the opening question. Extremists who
reduce faith to a fortress do not understand a simple truth: faith cannot be
partitioned. Islam was a revelation for mankind; it cannot be usurped by a
minor tract of geography. Nations are created by and for men, within boundaries
of language or culture or tribe. Religion comes from God; it is not a political
tool for human ambition. Those who equate religion with nation distort the
first and destroy the second. Pakistan has become a battlefield for
dysfunctional forces because theocrats will not permit it to become a rational
state.
Logic suggests a reciprocal offer: Pakistani Muslims would
be safer in India. But that offer cannot extend to Hafiz Saeed. His mission is
to be India's adversary. What he does not understand is that he is really Pakistan's
enemy.
1 comment:
Hafiz Saeed can not travel borders for the fear of arrest but he knows that his ideology can travel beyond borders and this is why those who stand against people like him are so disadvantaged. Unless the society of Pakistan transforms itself and the government of Pakistan comes out of its state of paranoia both Indian and Afghanistan will also suffer the effects of people like him not just Pakistan.
Post a Comment