Byline
The will and won’t of corruption
M.J. Akbar
A neuroscientist of Indian origin, V.S.
Ramachandran, has noted that the human brain might get lost in variations of “free
will”, but can certainly be clear about a “free won’t”. Mr Ramachandran should
start classes for powerful Indian politicians. Dangle a temptation before them,
and stick to “will”, rarely opting for “won’t”.
One sign of the march of Indian democracy
is creative progress in the science of corruption. In the shoddy old days,
someone took a bag stuffed with cash, a flunky counted the rupees and took it
to the master’s bedroom. A high dignitary like a Prime Minister would get more
respect; his cash came in a proper suitcase. A bull operator on the Mumbai
stock exchange claimed in the early 1990s that he had gifted P.V. Narasimha Rao
with a suitcase packed with Rs 1 crores in neat bundles. These days, of course,
such a pittance would be below the dignity of even junior Cabinet ministers.
You will recall that last year Beni Prasad Verma, a proud member of Dr Manmohan
Singh’s Cabinet, laughed when his colleague was accused of skimming Rs 70 lakh.
Too small a figure to be credible, Verma chortled. Did Dr Manmohan Singh frown?
Not at all. Verma is still a Cabinet minister.
Perhaps suitcases are passé, perhaps not.
More sophisticated politicians use a brilliant variation. They pick up loot
through a relative, as payment for services rendered. And so a minister’s wife
gets crores in legal fees for a transaction worth possibly lakhs, if worth
anything at all. How can you argue with that? Value, like beauty, lies in the
eye of the beholder. If a chit-fund businessman treats your wife’s legal acumen
at such worth, who are we to argue? Has Dr Singh done anything? Silence remains
his only answer.
One great illusion of the last decade has
been our belief that Dr Manmohan Singh would ensure corruption-free governance
since he himself was above board. The latest expose in the spectrum and coal mine
scams proves beyond any argument that his personal reputation provided cover
for massive theft by his ministers. He knew, and did nothing about it, because
his own survival as PM was at stake. The CBI affidavit to the Supreme Court in
the coal scam is a devastating indictment of his government. It proves that CBI
and law officers lied to Court earlier to protect the government. It admits
that its affidavit was vetted by the Prime Minister’s Office and the Law Minister,
Ashwani Kumar. The explanation that Kumar was making only grammatical corrections
is not only stupid, but also arrogant. It assumes that the rest of us,
including justices of the Supreme Court, are fools. The joint secretary in PMO,
who got in touch with CBI, reports directly to the Prime Minister. Dr Singh
made Ashwani Kumar Law Minister not because he delivers zillions of votes to
the Congress, but because of his proximity to the PM.
Mrs Indira Gandhi once dismissed corruption
as an international phenomenon. She was right. The nexus between politicians,
big business and a few useful friends in media is also an old story. Witness
this report, datelined Berlin, first published exactly 100 years ago and
reproduced in the International Herald
Tribune of 22 April 2013: “The charges of bribery of Government officials
by members of the Krupp firm have momentarily sunk into insignificance compares
with new charges launched against German armament interests of fomenting
international rivalries and ill-feeling. Selecting France as a fertile field
for these machinations, the armament interests endeavoured to circulate false
reports in the French press with a view to frightening Germany into buying
large supplies of arms. The false announcement that the French army intends to
double its supply of machine was evidently intended to spur the Germans on to
double their own supply.”
But neither age nor global expanse makes
corruption a virtue. The difference between Europe and India a century later is
that Europe reveals names of those who hold secret accounts in Swiss banks. In
India we specialise in creating escape routes for the unlucky few who are
discovered with their hands in the nation’s treasury.
There is a saving grace. India is a
democracy. When Indians get angry on an epic scale, they rise with a fury that
ravages the ruling party.
Whenever corruption tops the voters’
agenda, the establishment is reduced to roughly half its previous strength in
the Lok Sabha. In 1974, the late Jayaprakash Narayan led an unprecedented stir against
corruption. A desperate Mrs Gandhi was forced to declare an Emergency in 1975.
In 1977 Congress lost over 200 seats, ending up with only 150 MPs. In 1989, Bofors
allegations slashed Congress from 420 MPs to less than 200. Narasimha Rao, who
had more than corruption to worry about, was similarly mauled in 1996. If the pattern
persists, Congress could drop to around 100 after the next general elections.
3 comments:
100 Seats; if the congress+CIA give up the ownership of the e-ballot boxes.
As sharp as ever.
Who said that a kind of ruler is imposed on society shows the level of society. Illiterate of most, divided in cast, poor by economics , HAND to MOUTH existance.... this is the indian society. It will elect opportunist rouge political leader.
And what we are extremely HYPOCRAT.
We need to address root cause as weel as go for immediate solution such as LOKPAL with consensus. No new Autocrat/hypocrat such as JAn Lokpal.
Post a Comment